Jones v. City of Frederick, Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jones v. City of Frederick, Maryland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1855

JAMES JONES; SHARON JONES,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

CITY OF FREDERICK, MARYLAND; LOUMIS GENE ALSTON; DIANA MARIE KIMMEL; DEBBIE SHANKIE; JAMES HIRAM KIPPE, JR.,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

FREDERICK COUNTY, MARYLAND; STATE OF MARYLAND; SCOTT L. ROLLE; CHARLES J. SMITH; FREDERICK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07- cv-03010-AMD)

Submitted: November 5, 2008 Decided: November 24, 2008

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Joseph Christmas, Stephen M. Gensemer, Justin Gregory Nunzio, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. David Bruce Stratton, JORDAN COYNE & SAVITS, Washington, D.C.; Kirsten E. Keating, BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Debbie Shankie, James Hiram Kippe, Jr., Appellees Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

James and Sharon Jones appeal a district court order

granting summary judgment to the City of Frederick and Loumis

Gene Alston and dismissing their civil rights complaint

concerning James Jones’ mistaken arrest for a crime and

dismissing their state law claims arising from the same

incident. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the

district court. See Jones v. City of Frederick, Md., No. 1:07-

cv-03010-AMD (D. Md. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished