United States v. Haneiph

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Haneiph

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7524

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KURT SHAWN HANEIPH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:96-cr-00227-CMH-1)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 1, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kurt Shawn Haneiph, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kurt Haneiph appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Haneiph, No. 1:96-cr-00227-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 14,

entered July 15, 2008).

We grant Haneiph’s motion to file a supplemental

appendix. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished