Thomas v. Olshausen
Thomas v. Olshausen
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1769
RANDY L. THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
YNEZ OLSHAUSEN; MARY ELLEN MCDONALD; PETER GORMAN; CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE; CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00130-GCM)
Submitted: November 10, 2008 Decided: December 11, 2008
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Weston Johnson, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Richard Harcourt Fulton, Sardar Mujeeb Shah-Khan, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Thomas J. Ziko, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Thomas v. Olshausen, No. 3:07-cv-00130-GCM (W.D.N.C.
filed June 16, 2008 & entered June 17, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished