Roy W. Gray appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gray, No. 3:99-cr-00086-nkm-1 (W.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2008).

We deny Gray’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *165 fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.