United States v. Goodman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Goodman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7061

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTOINE LAMONT GOODMAN,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00020-RAJ-JEB-1)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 17, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antoine Lamont Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Antoine Lamont Goodman appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Goodman, No. 2:03-cr-00020-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. May 16, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished