Bellamy v. Wells

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bellamy v. Wells

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7741

ENGRAM M. BELLAMY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ALYSSA CAMPBELL WELLS; BRENT UZDANOVICS; DOUG DAVIS, Waynesboro Police Department,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

WAYNESBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:07-cv-00035-sgw)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 17, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Engram M. Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Hustis Milnor, ZUNKA, MILNOR, CARTER & INIGO, LTD., Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Engram M. Bellamy seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his claims as to one of the four defendants in

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint; the action is proceeding

as to the remaining defendants. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000),

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order Bellamy seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory

or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished