U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

In Re: Pearson v.

In Re: Pearson v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2008

In Re: Pearson v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1413

In Re: MARION EDWARD PEARSON, JR., Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:06-cv-00069)

Submitted: November 19, 2008 Decided: December 22, 2008

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marion Edward Pearson, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Marion Edward Pearson, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court recently denied Pearson’s § 2254 petition. Accordingly, because the district court has decided Pearson’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.