Hough v. Hale

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hough v. Hale

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8061

CURTIS GLENN HOUGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROBERT H. HALE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00389-RBS-FBS)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 29, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Glenn Hough, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Curtis Glenn Hough appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hough v.

Hale, No. 2:08-cv-00389-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 9 &

entered Sept. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished