Henderson v. Liggin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Henderson v. Liggin, 300 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2008)

Henderson v. Liggin

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Lamont Henderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. Liggin, No. 3:07-cv-00227-CMC, 2008 WL 1766674 (D.S.C. Apr. 11, 2008). We further deny Henderson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Lamont HENDERSON v. P. LIGGIN, Federal Correctional Officer, in his individual and official capacity Warden John J. Lamanna, in his individual and official capacity Officer R.C. McLafferty, SIA, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Published