U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

McCoy v. Rosenblatt

McCoy v. Rosenblatt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2008
304 F. App'x 175

McCoy v. Rosenblatt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Rosenblatt, No. 1:05-cv-00480-WDQ (D.Md. Mar. 17, 2008). We deny McCoy’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.