McCoy v. Rosenblatt
McCoy v. Rosenblatt
304 F. App'x 175
McCoy v. Rosenblatt
Opinion of the Court
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Rosenblatt, No. 1:05-cv-00480-WDQ (D.Md. Mar. 17, 2008). We deny McCoy’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.