Chase v. Baskerville

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 31, 2008

Chase v. Baskerville, 305 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to dismiss Appellee’s Rehabilitation Act claims on the basis of sovereign immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chase v. Baskerville, 508 F.Supp.2d 492 (E.D.Va. 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Wesley CHASE, Plaintiff—Appellee, United States of America, Intervenor/Plaintiff— v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden of the Powhatan Correctional Center, he is sued in his personal and official capacities Parker, Ms., Principal of the Powhatan Correctional Center, she is sued in her personal and official capacities P.M. Henick, Regional Ombudsman, Virginia Department of Corrections, he or she is sued within he or she personal and official capacities S. Trimmer, Ms., Special Education, director for the Virginia Department of Education, she is sued in her personal and official capacities
Status: Published