Lee v. Clark

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Lee v. Clark, 266 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2008)

Lee v. Clark

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Lee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lee v. Clark, No. 1:05-cv-00897-WDQ (D. Md. June 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Reginald LEE, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Kevin CLARK John Doe, Jr. Richard Roe, Officer, in their individual and official capacities Baltimore Police Department Theo Fleet, Officer, Defendants—Appellees, and Martin O'Malley Douglas L. Patterson Baltimore City Council City of Baltimore Sheila Dixon
Status
Published