Yongo v. US Army Active Duty
Yongo v. US Army Active Duty
267 F. App'x 230
Yongo v. US Army Active Duty
Opinion of the Court
In these consolidated appeals, Paul Yon-go appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000), and denying his motion for an injunction pending appeal. We have reviewed the record and find that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yongo v. U.S. Army Active Duty, No. 5:07-cv-00093-FL (E.D.N.C. May 2, 2007; May 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.