Furtado v. Rupp
Furtado v. Rupp
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. ,
Unpublished opinions are pot binding precedent in this circuit.
Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). In his informal appellate brief, Furtado failed to address the district court’s basis for dismissing his case. Therefore, Furtado has waived ap
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Edson FURTADO, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Nelson Woodward RUPP, Jr., Judge State of Maryland, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Published