U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

Bradley v. General Counsel

Bradley v. General Counsel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 2, 2008
280 F. App'x 251

Bradley v. General Counsel

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Gardner Bradley appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bradley v. Gen. Counsel, for Cent. Office, BOP, No. 3:07-cv-00112-JPB-JSK, 2008 WL 713921 (Mar. 14, 2008). We deny Bradley’s motion for a preliminary injunction and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.