Bryant v. Washington Mutual Bank
Cases that cite this one
30 later published cases cite this decision. The 20 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Pitts v. Navy Federal Credit Union (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2025)
- BATISTA v. AT&T INC. (District Court, D. New Jersey 2025)
- Grimes v. Huntington National Bank (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2025)
- Pamela Ann Parris (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia 2025)
- Thomas v. Wells Fargo Bank (United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama 2024)
- Chavis v. T-Mobile US, Inc. (District Court, W.D. Texas 2024)
- Yates v. The Money Source, Inc (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2023)
- Arau v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2023)
- Aquino v. City of Charlotte (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 2023)
- Thomas v. ServBank (United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama 2023)
- Wood v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2022)
- Potter v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2022)
- STILLWELL v. UNITED STATES (District Court, M.D. North Carolina 2021)
- Naja v. Zahir (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2021)
- Naja v. Ahmed (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2021)
- Naja v. Peters (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2021)
- Ince v. Ince (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2021)
- ZAHIR v. HOGAN (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2021)
- Naja v. Peters (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2021)
- Harrison v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2020)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Maureen Bryant appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and conspiracy regarding foreclosure proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryant v. Washington Mutual Bank, 524 F.Supp.2d 753 (W.D.Va. 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.