Wyatt v. Mahon
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ruttenberg v. Jones (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2009)
- Mendes v. Wendling (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2020)
- Snodgrass v. Richardson (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2024)
- Williams v. Gilbert (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2023)
- Arku v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (District Court, W.D. North Carolina 2022)
- Lowe v. Herring (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2022)
- Williams v. Gilbert (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2022)
- Hardaway v. Myers (District Court, D. South Carolina 2020)
- Minifield v. City of Winchester (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2020)
- Ikechukwu Okorie v. Virginia Crawford (5th Cir. 2019)
- Latson v. Clarke (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2018)
- Latson v. Clarke (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2017)
- Trump Tight, LLC v. Bell (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2016)
- Doe v. Alger (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2016)
- United States v. Gigliotti (District Court, E.D. New York 2015)
- Bretemps v. Town of Brentwood (District Court, D. Maryland 2014)
- United Pet Supply, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 2013)
- Sansotta v. Town of Nags Head (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 2012)
- Merchant v. Fairfax County, Va. (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2011)
- Ruttenberg v. Jones (4th Cir. 2010)
- JDC MANAGEMENT, LLC v. Reich (District Court, W.D. Michigan 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Keith E. Wyatt appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and dismissing claims against Defendant King for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wyatt v. Mahon, No. 2:06-cv-00348-JBF (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.