U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

Thomas v. Fulton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 22, 2008 · Duncan, Traxler, Wilkinson

284 F. App'x 45

Counsel

Randy L. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Sardar Mujeeb Shah-Khan, City Attorney’s Office, Charlotte, North Carolina; Mark Weston Johnson, McGuirewoods, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In re: Thomas (4th Cir. 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Randy L. Thomas appeals the district court’s orders entered in his action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), which (1) granted the motions to dismiss filed by R. Harcourt Fulton and James Hammond (No. 08-1111); (2) denied Thomas’ motions filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) (No. OS-1292); and (3) reimposed a prefiling injunction on remand (No. 08-1325). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Fulton, No. 3:07-cv-00200-GCM, 2007 WL 4365660 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2007; 2008 WL 320031, Feb. 4, 2008; 2008 WL 413855, Feb. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *46presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.