U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Shannon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 25, 2008 · Motz, Shedd, Wilkinson

285 F. App'x 65

Counsel

Pernell Shannon, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Pernell Shannon appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Shannon, No. 6:02-cr-01360-HMH-5 (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.