U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2008

Akinro v. Maher

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 11, 2008

286 F. App'x 45

Counsel

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Akinro v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his case based on newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. Maher, No. 1:02-cv-00555-CCB (D.Md. Apr. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *46presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.