Yongo v. Nationwide Insurance

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Yongo v. Nationwide Insurance, 299 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2008)

Yongo v. Nationwide Insurance

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Paul Yongo appeals the district court’s orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and denying his post-judgment motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yongo v. Nationwide Ins. Co., No. 5:07-cv-00094-D (E.D.N.C. May 16, 2008; May 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*260fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Paul YONGO v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY Carol Martin Rhonda Hogge, AIC Nationwide Claims Department Nationwide Loss Adjusters Sharron Stephen-Henley Arthur Walter Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company of America Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company J. Cater Glass Harold C. Rhudy, and Latonya Michele McNeil
Status
Published