Bruns v. Potter

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bruns v. Potter

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2125

STEPHEN E. BRUNS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01076-JFM)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: January 8, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas James Gagliardo, THE GAGLIARDO LAW FIRM, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stephen E. Bruns appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant on Bruns’ claim

of retaliation, in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See

Bruns v. Potter, No. 1:06-cv-01076-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 22, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished