United States v. Hough

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hough

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7522

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARK ANTHONY HOUGH,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:02-cr-00471-TLW-3)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 15, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Anthony Hough, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Hough appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(2006) motion for reduction of his

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Hough, No. 4:02-cr-00471-TLW-3

(D.S.C. filed July 21, 2008; entered July 22, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished