UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2040

YURI J. STOYANOV,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DONALD C. WINTER, Secretary of the Navy; STEPHAN W. PETRI, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of the Carderock Division; GARY M. JEBSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70 Carderock Division; KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Acting Head of Code 74 Carderock Division; JAMES H. KING, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74 Carderock Division; JOHN C. DAVIES, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Deputy Head of Code 74 Carderock Division; MATHEW CRAUN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 722 Carderock Division; PAUL SHANG, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 72 Carderock Division; GERALD SMITH, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Head of Code 70 Carderock Division; ROGER FORD, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 7014 Carderock Division; M. KATHLEEN FOWLER, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Administrative Officer Code 709; DAVID CARON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Assistant Counsel Code 39; JOSEPHINE MCGRATH, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Complaints Manager/Acting Deputy EEO Chief Code 034,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:06- cv-01244-AMD)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 15, 2009 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Yuri J. Stoyanov appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended,

to 634 (2000), the Whisleblower Protection Act,

, 1221 and 2302 (2006), and various state law tort

claims, as well as its order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s orders. See Stoyanov v. Winter, No. 1:06-cv-01244-AMD

(D. Md. Aug. 11, 2008; Aug. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3