Hester v. Armstrong
Hester v. Armstrong
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1775
VALERIE HESTER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ELLIOTT ARMSTRONG; PARAMOUNT OF RALEIGH, LLC,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
PINE TREE VILLA ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00458-H)
Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 15, 2009
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Valerie Hester, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Valerie Hester appeals the district court’s order
granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing
Hester’s complaint without prejudice for failure to properly
serve process on the Defendants. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hester v. Armstrong,
No. 5:07-cv-00458-H (E.D.N.C. June 19, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished