U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Austin

United States v. Austin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 23, 2009

United States v. Austin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7729

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONNIE J. AUSTIN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:02-cr-00124-HEH-1)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 23, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnie J. Austin, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Donnie Austin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Austin, No. 3:02-cr-00124-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.