Kamara v. Mukasey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kamara v. Mukasey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1089

AMINATA BUBU KAMARA,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 08-1549

AMINATA BUBU KAMARA,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: January 23, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petitions dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Lindsay E. Williams, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Aminata Kamara, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone,

petitions for review of orders of the Board of Immigration

Appeals denying her motions to reconsider. We have carefully

reviewed the administrative record and find that we lack

jurisdiction to review the Board’s order of November 30, 2007.

See Tamenut v. Mukasey,

521 F.3d 1000, 1002-05

(8th Cir. 2008).

We thus dismiss the petition for review in part with respect to

that order. Next, we find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s

denial of Kamara’s second motion to reconsider. We accordingly

deny the petition for review with respect to that order for the

reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Kamara (B.I.A. Apr. 8,

2008). We deny Kamara’s motion to remand and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished