Kamara v. Mukasey
Kamara v. Mukasey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1089
AMINATA BUBU KAMARA,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-1549
AMINATA BUBU KAMARA,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: January 23, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petitions dismissed in part and denied in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Lindsay E. Williams, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Aminata Kamara, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone,
petitions for review of orders of the Board of Immigration
Appeals denying her motions to reconsider. We have carefully
reviewed the administrative record and find that we lack
jurisdiction to review the Board’s order of November 30, 2007.
See Tamenut v. Mukasey,
521 F.3d 1000, 1002-05(8th Cir. 2008).
We thus dismiss the petition for review in part with respect to
that order. Next, we find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s
denial of Kamara’s second motion to reconsider. We accordingly
deny the petition for review with respect to that order for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Kamara (B.I.A. Apr. 8,
2008). We deny Kamara’s motion to remand and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished