U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Samuel v. Proctor

Samuel v. Proctor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 22, 2009

Samuel v. Proctor

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7233

ERIC SAMUEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LORI D. PROCTOR, Public Defender; BOYD YOUNG, Public Defender of the Charleston County Public Defender's Office; CHARLESTON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (3:07-cv-01586-PMD)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 22, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Samuel, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Lynwood Brown, Russell Grainger Hines, Wilbur Eugene Johnson, YOUNG, CLEMENT & RIVERS, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Eric Samuel appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his civil rights claim, to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Samuel’s legal malpractice claim, and to grant Defendants summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Samuel v. Proctor, No. 3:07-cv- 01586-PMD (D.S.C. June 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.