Samuel v. Proctor
Samuel v. Proctor
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7233
ERIC SAMUEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORI D. PROCTOR, Public Defender; BOYD YOUNG, Public Defender of the Charleston County Public Defender's Office; CHARLESTON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (3:07-cv-01586-PMD)
Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 22, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Samuel, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Lynwood Brown, Russell Grainger Hines, Wilbur Eugene Johnson, YOUNG, CLEMENT & RIVERS, LLP, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Eric Samuel appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his
civil rights claim, to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over
Samuel’s legal malpractice claim, and to grant Defendants
summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Samuel v. Proctor, No. 3:07-cv-
01586-PMD (D.S.C. June 25, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished