Russell v. McWeeny
Russell v. McWeeny
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2265
JOSEPH M. RUSSELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL P. MCWEENY; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; VICTOR ELION, P.H.D.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00063-JBF-JEB)
Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph M. Russell, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Monolo, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; William Norman Watkins, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Joseph R. Russell appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to District of Columbia
Court of Appeals v. Feldman,
460 U.S. 462(1983), and Rooker v.
Fidelity Trust Co.,
263 U.S. 413(1923). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Russell v. McWeeny,
No. 4:08-cv-00063-JBF-JEB (E.D. Va. Oct. 2, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished