Wamsley v. Ballard
Wamsley v. Ballard
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7872
WARREN D. WAMSLEY,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN DAVID BALLARD,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:07-cv-00041-REM-JES)
Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren D. Wamsley, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Goldberg, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Warren D. Wamsley appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting in part and denying in part his
28 U.S.C. § 2254(2006)
petition. The district court granted a certificate of
appealability. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Wamsley v. Ballard, No. 2:07-cv-00041-
REM-JES (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 8, 2008). We deny Wamsley’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We further deny Wamsley’s motion for
clarification as moot. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished