United States v. Ripley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ripley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7731

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WILBERT L. RIPLEY,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00147-REP-1)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbert L. Ripley, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Elizabeth Chase, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wilbert L. Ripley appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Ripley,

No. 3:99-cr-00147-REP-1 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 11, 2008; entered

Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished