U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Edmonds

United States v. Edmonds
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 4, 2009

United States v. Edmonds

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7680

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVEN ELLIS EDMONDS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:04-cr-00072-SGW-5)

Submitted: January 14, 2009 Decided: February 4, 2009

Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Ellis Edmonds, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Steven Ellis Edmonds appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Edmonds, No. 7:04- cr-00072-SGW-5 (W.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.