U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Beamon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 4, 2009 · Gregory, King, Per Curiam, Traxler

309 F. App'x 788

Counsel

Karl Earl Beamon, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Karl Earl Beamon appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Beamon, No. 4:99-cr-00004-JBF-l (E.D.Va. Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.