United States v. Spratley
United States v. Spratley
311 F. App'x 603
United States v. Spratley
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Clarence Spratley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Spratley, No. 3:95-cr-00008-RLW-1 (E.D.Va. Aug. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.