U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Head

United States v. Head
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 2009 · Agee, Duncan, Per Curiam, Wilkinson
312 F. App'x 547

United States v. Head

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theresa Jane Head seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 2006 & Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dis-positive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Head has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Head’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately present *548 ed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.