U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Lomax

United States v. Lomax
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2009

United States v. Lomax

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8321

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. CLARENCE J. LOMAX, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00406-RLW-1)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 26, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence J. Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Clarence J. Lomax appeals the district court’s order denying the his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Amendments 706 and 711 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lomax, No. 3:00-cr-00406-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.