Haburn v. Kilby
Haburn v. Kilby
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1785
JAMES D. HABURN; STEFANIE A. RODEN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JOHN F. KILBY; THE BANK OF FINCASTLE; JOHN/JANE DOE, Owners/Co-owners, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:04-cv-00336-jct)
Submitted: February 11, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James D. Haburn, Stefanie A. Roden, Appellants Pro Se. C. Jacob Ladenheim, Fincastle, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James D. Haburn and Stefanie A. Roden appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action against John F. Kilby and the Bank of Fincastle. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haburn v. Kilby, No. 7:04-cv-00336-jct (W.D. Va. June 11, 2008). Additionally, we deny Appellants’ motion for production of transcripts as moot.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.