Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office
Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate Office
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7218
GREGORY BRYCE TANNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORDSTROM CORPORATE OFFICE, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00241-RAJ-FBS)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Bryce Tanner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gregory Bryce Tanner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tanner v. Nordstrom Corporate, No. 2:08-cv-00241-RAJ-FBS (E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2008 & entered June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.