U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Crepeau v. Chao

Crepeau v. Chao
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 23, 2009

Crepeau v. Chao

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1057

PATRICIA CREPEAU, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ELAINE CHAO, Secretary, Department of Labor, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-01308-CMH-TCB)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia Crepeau, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine DeRoever Wood, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Patricia Crepeau appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her religious discrimination and sexual harassment claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and her claim challenging the Merit Systems Protection Board’s decision upholding her fifteen-day employment suspension. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Crepeau v. Chao, No. 1:06-cv-01308-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 13, 2007; entered Nov. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.