U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Nixon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 6, 2009 · Niemeyer, Michael, Gregory

315 F. App'x 489

Counsel

Reita Pauline Pendry, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Ashe-ville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Jerome Nixon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nixon, No. 3:00-cr-00222-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.