United States v. Harris
United States v. Harris
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8051
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DENNIS HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00113-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 6, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dennis Harris appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders for the reasons stated therein. See United States v. Harris, No. 2:92-cr-00113-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 7, 2008, entered July 10, 2008; filed Aug. 27, 2008, entered Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.