U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Patterson

United States v. Patterson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 5, 2009

United States v. Patterson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7163

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM LEE PATTERSON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:00-cr-00187-RGD-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lee Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: William Lee Patterson appeals the extent of the reduction granted in his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Patterson, No. 2:00-cr-00187-RGD-1 (E.D Va. filed May 27, 2008; entered May 28, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.