U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Middleton

United States v. Middleton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 11, 2009 · Niemeyer, Shedd, Hamilton
316 F. App'x 245

United States v. Middleton

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Middleton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Middleton, No. 1:92-cr-00348-CMH-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.