Hurt v. United States Marshal Service
Hurt v. United States Marshal Service
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7271
TYRONE HURT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; UNKNOWN AGENT; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE D.C., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: February 20, 2009 Decided: March 10, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens complaint. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. United States Marshal Serv., No. 1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 24, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.