U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Morton

United States v. Morton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 9, 2009 · Wilkinson, Traxler, Duncan
316 F. App'x 226

United States v. Morton

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamison J. Morton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Morton, No. 3:05-cr-00409-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Sept. 19, 2008). Further, we deny Morton’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.