U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

McGary v. Johnson

McGary v. Johnson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 9, 2009

McGary v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7632

REGINALD A. MCGARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENE JOHNSON; BRYAN WATSON; DOCTOR LEE; DOCTOR THOMPSON; M.

STANFORD; LAILA HOLMES; JANE & JOHN DOES, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00418-jct-mfu)

Submitted: February 12, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald A. McGary, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Reginald A. McGary appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006), for failure to state a claim and the court’s order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGary v. Johnson, No. 7:08-cv-00418-jct-mfu (W.D. Va. July 30, 2008; Aug. 8, 2008). We deny McGary’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.