U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Sewraz v. Guice

Sewraz v. Guice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 20, 2009

Sewraz v. Guice

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8173

CHETANAND KUMAR SEWRAZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD GUICE, Lieutenant; SCOTT BAILEY, Detective; KATHERINE ATKINS, Evidence Technician; DARRIN EDWARD BROMSETH, Detective; CRAIG BROWN, Detective; JODY BRUNNER, Detective; JUANAMETTRE BUTLER, Officer; FRANK CARPENTER; JESSICA CHAMER, Evidence Technician, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00035-RLW)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 20, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chetanand Kumar Sewraz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Chetanand Kumar Sewraz appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewraz v. Guice, No. 3:08-cv-00035-RLW (E.D.

Va. Aug. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.