U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Hardy v. Bennett

Hardy v. Bennett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 17, 2009

Hardy v. Bennett

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8432

LESTER HARDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOYD BENNETT; DENNIS ROWLAND, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:08-ct-03044-H)

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lester Hardy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Lester Hardy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardy v. Bennett, No. 5:08-ct-03044-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.