U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Sherrill

United States v. Sherrill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 26, 2009 · Wilkinson, Motz, Agee
319 F. App'x 280

United States v. Sherrill

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Laricco Eugene Sherrill appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduced sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Sherrill, No. 3:04-cr00220-RJC-CH-1, 2008 WL 3992167 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.